Richard H. Berg - 05:25am Oct 30, 1998 PST (#1688 of 1718) Got my copy of JULIE/GAUL yesterday, so I can answer questions . . .which I did for Norbert. Most were pure typos, but, briefly, here is what's important: 4.62. The elimination reference is solely to leaders "alone" Movemtn Chart: Ignore the (2) in Changing Facing; typoe. And make sure you read the word 'plus' below it. 6.98. The rule should say "other than for cohorts from the same legion" And the confusion Norbert had with Tribal Chiefs and # of Line Commands arose from the fact that he missed that 4.1 applies solely to Roman leaders. I'm also looking for someone to review JCGaul for BROG . . .more on that topic area. Back to work . . . RHB ------------------------- Richard H. Berg - 05:47am Oct 31, 1998 PST (#1716 of 1718) Norbert Goes to Delphi . . . "You say to ignore the reference to 6.58, Pre-Arranged Withdrawal. Does that mean the tactic is not used by the late Republican armies and their opponents? " Right. About the only time we could find it being usewd by anyone (and certainly not Romans, whose innate sense of superiority made a PAW/d maneuver philosophically anathema, was by the Helvetians at Bibracte. This is covered by the scenario rules, as it was more a spur of the moment idea well, given the arrival of the Tulingi, etc., maybe it wasn't!!) than one of those Barcan Carthainian Treachery moves. "And the confusion Norbert had with Tribal Chiefs and # of Line Commands arose from the fact that he missed that 4.1 applies solely to Roman leaders.... I saw that the rule heading applied to "Roman Leader Counters", however, the text I call into question clearly states PCs and TCs, i.e. Proconsuls and Tribal Chiefs. To wit: Line/Legion Command (LC) Rating: (Activated Side only) The number to the right of the slash indicates that , if eligible [4.3], that PC or TC -- instead of issuing a series of individual orders to a given number of units -- may issue a Move or Fire order to all units in that number of Lines (TC), or all cohorts of a number of lgeions equal to his Legion Command Capability, whose Legates are within range, and whose cohorts are within their Legate's range [4.34]. " RHB: Ignore the reference to PC/TC/T&A . . . typo time. (A chronic problem with using old rules as templates. Section 4.1 refers solely to Roman commanders; 4.5 to Tribals. However, some minor errata (minor in that you could probably figure it out yourself) The Sabis. Romos get 5 Numidian A's and 3 Cretan A's (not vice versa) The map. The terrain legend is a bit weird. Major River should be minor, and the minor a stream. And I know Mark mentioned something about a scatter diagram, but, for the life of me, I can't remember what we use it for. Britain Invasion (Some of you looking for "something completely different" should give this a try; most unusual, and far more difficult for the Romans than it appears.) Debarking. Romans may not debark into Level 1 land hexes; either Beach or sea hexes, that's all. I'm sure we'll find more . . . . RHB ------------------------- Norbert Brunhuber - 06:20am Oct 31, 1998 PST (#1717 of 1718) Favorite settings: Ancients & Medieval Norbert Goes to Delphi . . . Thank you for the patient errata oracle deliverance, Richard. Now be sure to keep your filthy paws off my offering in the temple treasury! --Norbert -------------------------